Chaney v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is a motion by appellants for an order recalling the remittitur issued herein, and for an order striking from the remittitur the provision allowing respondent, (petitioner in the lower court) costs on appeal. The basis of the motion is that the remittitur (1) was inadvertently issued, and (2) that respondent is not entitled to costs on appeal.
The undisputed facts are:
Respondent obtained from the trial court a writ of mandate directing payment to her of a pension of seventy-five dollars per month as the widow of Albert G. Chaney. From this judgment appellants appealed to this court and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Chaney v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Durkee v. GarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'DELL v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Chin Ott Wong v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952