Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 14, 2009No. 2007-CA-00879-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, C.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. On January 17, 2007, Drew and Janet Anderson were granted a divorce by the Chancery Court of Warren County based on the ground of irreconcilable differences. The chancellor equitably distributed the marital assets, ordered Drew to pay child support, and awarded Janet permanent periodic alimony and attorney’s fees. Aggrieved, Drew appeals the chancellor’s award of alimony and attorney’s fees. Janet has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Drew’s appeal is time-barred. We find that Drew’s appeal is time-barred and, thus, dismiss this appeal.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Duncan v. DuncanMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Pilgrim Rest Missionary Baptist Church v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Banks v. City Finance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  2. R.A.S. v. S.S.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  3. Frank Hegman and Hegman Farms Inc. v. Clay Adcock, Will Phillips, Alfred F. Eaton and Ann W. BallardCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API