R.A.S. v. S.S.

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. R.A.S. Jr. (“Matt”) argues the chancellor wrongly denied his request for an accounting of S.S.’s (“Anna”) use of child-support payments.1 He also alleges the chancellor violated his due-process rights by restricting him from presenting evidence on his modification claim. Anna appeals from a different order, challenging the chancellor’s handling of her request for expenses, specifically those for the children’s transportation and school uniforms.2

¶ 2. We do not reach the merits since the chancellor failed to address all of the contested issues. Because additional…