Fincham Ex Rel. Fincham v. Mueller
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I disagree with that part of the majority opinion holding that the conduct of the operators of motor vehicles prior to a collision, the location and speed of such vehicles, and the physical facts existing at the scene of an accident, constitute a transaction within the meaning of the dead man’s statute.
The word transaction as used in the dead man’s statute means a personal transaction with the deceased, as this court has heretofore indicated. See, Harnett v. Holdrege, 5 Neb. (Unoff.) 114, 97 N. W. 443; Fitch v. Martin, 74 Neb. 538, 104 N. W. 1072; In re Estate of Baker, 144 Neb. 797, 14 N. W.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Shaneybrook v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- In Re Estate of TaltySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Krantz v. KrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Baker v. KirwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.