Ronning v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 11, 1924:
Doerfler, J.
In enacting the workmen’s compensation act, the legislature, in place of the master’s liability for damages for negligence to his servant, substituted a uniform compensation to employees who had suffered injury, and a death benefit for dependents. This compensation under the act inured to the benefit of all employees subject to the provisions thereof. This departure, while practically an innovation in this country at the time of its adoption, had been in force for many years in European countries. The principle underlying this act…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Lewis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Frank Martin-Laskin Co. v. GoetschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Town of Stephenson v. SchelkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flynn v. CarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Miller & Rose v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.