State v. Cichon
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The issue certified to us for review requires that we determine the requisite degree of culpability to sustain a conviction under Ohio Adm. Code 5537-2-04 (D).
Although this explicit question is one of first impression, this court has construed the phrase “without due regard” as used in R. C. 4511.20 and 4511.201,2 statutes embodying essentially the same offense as the one set forth in Ohio Adm. Code 5537-2-04(D).3 The decisions construing these statutes hold that R. C. 4511.20 and 4511.201 seek to punish drivers for their failure to exercise reasonable prudence in the operation of vehicles in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State v. MeanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Harvest Queen Mill & Elevator Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Radecki v. LammersOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HasslerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Akron v. CharleyAkron Municipal Court · 1982
- City of Cleveland v. IsaacsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Columbus v. NolanFranklin County Municipal Court · 2009
- Coryell v. Bank One Trust Co. N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.