Legal Opinion

Radecki v. Lammers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1968No. 41371PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The sole question presented by the record in this cause may be stated as follows:

Does the record disclose any substantial, probative evidence to warrant an instruction to the jury upon “sudden emergency” by the trial court?

The Court of Appeals does not criticize the trial court’s definition of “sudden emergency” or the wording used in discussing it. See Francis v. Bieber, 10 Ohio St. 2d 65; Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1; Satterthwaite v. Morgan, 141 Ohio St. 447. The finding of error is confined to the bare statement that there was “no evidence in the record presenting an issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Satterthwaite v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Francis v. BieberOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Cuyahoga Community College DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Heidbreder v. Northampton Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. CichonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Sylvania v. BadgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. City of Columbus v. StarghillFranklin County Municipal Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API