Grunauer v. Westchester Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. Action by Grunauer and wife against the Westchester Fire Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Vredenburgh, J.
The fire insurance policy, the subject of this suit, was executed August 21st, 1902, between one Garretson and the defendant, and contains the following standard policy insurance conditions, authorized by statutory forms (Gen. Stat., p. 1766; Pamph. L. 1902, p. 437, § 77), viz., that “if the interest of the insured be other tiran unconditional and sole ownership, * * * or if any change, other than by the death of an insured, takes place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Cottingham v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Budelman v. American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Brickell v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Wootton Hotel Corporation v. Northern Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Finkbohner v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.