Legal Opinion

People v. Sauceda

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1962No. Crim. 3899PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of selling heroin in violation of section 11501 of the Health and Safety Code, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues: that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict on both counts; that the trial court erred in denying his motion to permit the jury to view the scene of the crime; in overruling his objections to certain testimony; in the admission of certain evidence as well as its instructions to the jury; and finally, that he has been denied due process of law by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. KiihoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. FarraraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. FontaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. GalvanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API