People v. Farrara
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Defendants James and Helen Parrara appeal from orders granting them probation and denying their motion for a new trial entered after they were found guilty of violations of Penal Code, section 337a. A jury trial was waived and it was stipulated that the ease should be submitted on the transcript of the preliminary hearing. Each defendant was found guilty of one count of recording bets on horse races (Pen. Code, § 337a, subd. (4)), and Helen was found guilty of one count of occupying premises for the purpose of bookmaking. (Pen. Code, § 337a subd. (2).)
On October 28, 1954, Officer Sherrer of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. KitchensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.