Legal Opinion

Hardrick v. Legal Services Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 3, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 81-3137PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARTHUR L. BURNETT, United States Magistrate.

Before the Magistrate is plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories, filed December 27, 1982, accompanied by plaintiff’s memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof. Plaintiff seeks to compel answers to interrogatories numbers 2, 3,4, 7, 8,9,10, 11,14,15,16,18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 38, 39, 52, 57, 58 and 59. On January 17, 1983 the defendant filed its points and authorities in opposition to plaintiff’s motion.

The Magistrate has reviewed the entire…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linda O’NEAL, Appellant, v. RICELAND FOODS, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Freyda Saltzman v. Fullerton Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  2. Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
  4. Robbins v. Camden City Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  5. Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API