Legal Opinion
Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 25, 2002No. IP 00-1179-C-T/KPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Chavez seeks an order from the Court compelling Defendant DaimlerChrysler to respond to interrogatories and produce documents in discovery. Defendant opposes Chavez’s discovery requests, claiming they are outside the scope of Rule 26, and refuses to produce information it deems “highly confidential” without Chavez entering into a protective order. In addition, Defendant moves to strike Chavez’s untimely reply brief.
*618For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- McGrath v. EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Cunningham v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Sanyo Laser Products, Inc. v. Arista Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Favale v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.