Bank of Ephraim v. Davis
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Defendant Davis appeals an order denying his motion to quash a writ of attachment. Plaintiff Bank, as defendant’s mortgagee, had the writ issued to attach certain personalty of Davis’. The writ was issued prior to the foreclosure sale of realty belonging to defendant. It was subject, as security, to the terms of the bank’s mortgage. The writ also suffered from other infirmities intrinsic to it, which are treated hereafter.
We reverse and remand with instructions to quash the writ. Costs to defendant Davis. All statutory references are to U.C.A., 1953, unless otherwise noted.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Paramount Insurance, Inc. v. Rayson & SmitleyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Blankenship v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re McNeelyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Bonnie & Hyde, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- UTAH MORTG. AND LOAN CO. v. BlackUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- National Loan Investors, L.P. v. GivensUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Bawden & Associates v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.