Legal Opinion

Converse Bridge Co. v. Grizzle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. — M. M'. Allison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

delivered tbe opinion of tlie Court.

The plaintiff below recovered a verdict and judgment against the bridge company for the sum of |5.000 as damages for the negligent killing of her husband, George W. Grizzle. The company appealed and has assigned errors.

The cause of action álleged in the declaration was that the defendant company was engaged in the business of making steel bridges, and in the conduct of its business employed a derrick, constructed for the main part of wood, located just outside of a shed, and used in hoisting, handling, and moving heavy material. It is then alleged that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morriss Bros. v. BowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Scandell v. Columbia Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Dyer v. Pittsburg Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Welsh v. CornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Casey-Hedges Co. v. GatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API