Legal Opinion

Casey-Hedges Co. v. Gates

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917Published

FROM HAMILTON Appeal from the' Circuit of Hamilton County.— Nathan L. Bachman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greeh

Walter Gates recovered a judgment for $1,500 against the Casey-Hedges Company for damages for personal injuries, which was affirmed by the court of civil appeals, and the case is before us on certiorari granted.

Gates was an experienced iron molder in the employ of the plaintiff in error, and the basis of his suit is alleged negligence of the plaintiff in error in furnishing him with defective appliances.

Plaintiff in error relies on his motion for a directed verdict, the disallowance of which he assigns as error in this court.

At the time he received his injuries the defendant in error was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . MillikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Ross v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Colton v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Hefferen v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API