Legal Opinion

Morriss Bros. v. Bowers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

EBOM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The plaintiff below, William Bowers, colored, recovered a verdict and judgment against Morriss Brothers for the sum of $350 for personal injuries. Defendants appealed and have assigned errors.

The facts are that Morriss Brothers were stone masons and stone dealers in the city of Memphis. William Bowers, colored, was a laborer in their employment, and it was a part of his duty to assist in handling stone and loading trucks, which were run into the mill where the stone or marble was sawed into slabs. Gang saw No. 4, where the accident happened, has a partition on either side of the track, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Magevney v. KarschTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Overstreet v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. Lively v. American Zinc Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API