Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Dingman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1933No. Docket No. 226, Calendar No. 36,702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Thomas P. Turner owned land bordering Lake Michigan in Berrien county, and had a surveyor prepare a plat of a part thereof, designat ing lots by numbers, together with dimensions. This plat was not recorded. Along the lake was quite a uniform bluff about 50 feet above the water and at times, especially when there was high water, the water washed the foot of the bluff, but most of the time there was a sand beach between the bluff and the water. The plat was laid out on top of the bluff upward of 167 feet from the meander line, with seven lots fronting a private roadway 125 feet from the rear…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Klotz v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Farnes v. Freeman LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Little v. KinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API