Crook v. Academy Drywall Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether an employee who suffers a compensable injury is eligible under General Statutes § 31-308b1 to *29receive a dependency allowance for a child born after the date of the employee’s injury but conceived prior *30to the date of that injury. We conclude that an employee is entitled to receive a dependency allowance for the child under such circumstances.
The parties have stipulated to the relevant facts. The plaintiff, Larry D. Crook, was employed by the named defendant, Academy Drywall Company,2 when he suffered a compensable injury to his lower back on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. HalsteadWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Routh v. List & Weatherly Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Decarli v. Manchester Public Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Laliberte v. United Security, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Walter v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Florence v. Town of PlainfieldConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
- Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.