Legal Opinion
East Bay Municipal Utility District v. United States Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 4, 1996No. Civil Action 93-1715 (GK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Renewed Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff brings this action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EB-MUD). EBMUD seeks recovery for certain remediation costs it has incurred and may incur in the future to clean up hazardous waste at the Penen Mine. Plaintiff alleges that the U.S. government is liable for these costs because of the involvement of various government…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Asarco Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1997
- E Bay Muni Util Dist v. COMMCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998