Legal Opinion

United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 28, 1997No. CIV-S-91-768 DFL JFMPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

LEVI, District Judge.

This is a cost recovery action brought by the United States and the State of California under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., to recover response costs for cleanup measures taken at the Iron Mountain Mine site, a series of now inactive mines on Iron Mountain located approximately nine miles northwest of Redding, California. Acid mine drainage from the old mine workings flows into the Sacramento river above the Keswick Dam. 1

In these cross motions for summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fmc Corporation v. United States Department of Commerce Ronald Brown, Secretary of Commerce, in His Official Capacity United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. State of Idaho v. Bunker Hill Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1986
  3. Long Beach Unified School District v. Dorothy B. Godwin California Living Trust, and Mobil Oil Corporation, Powerine Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
  5. Maxus Energy Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Asarco Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
  2. Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  4. TDY Holdings, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
  5. Bestfoods v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API