Legal Opinion

Lefever v. Lull Industries, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 23, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LANDAU, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Justin Lefever from the grant of summary judgment to defendant Lull Industries, Inc. on his complaint brought under the product line successor liability doctrine. See Ramirez v. Amsted Indus., Inc., 86 N.J. 332, 431 A.2d 811 (1981). Plaintiff was injured on January 17,1989 when a Lull 644 forklift, originally manufactured by defendant Lull Engineering Company, Inc. (Lull Engineering I) tipped over as he operated it. In 1990, plaintiff filed a defective design complaint against “Lull Engineering Co., Inc.,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Nieves v. Bruno Sherman Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Wilkerson v. CO Porter MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Goncalves v. Wire Technology & MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lefever v. K.P. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Potwora Ex Rel. Gray v. GripNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Lefever v. K.P. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Muratovic v. Market Solutions Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API