Legal Opinion

Taubert v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1987No. 19718Published

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment upholding the validity of a sheriff’s sale of real property. Appellant Taubert contends that the sale was invalid under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 69(d) because levy occurred after the return date of the writ. We agree and reverse.

Taubert purchased some Summit County property in 1978. At that time, the property was subject to a judgment lien held by Pacific States Pipe Co. (“Pacific”). In 1979, respondent Roberts purchased Pacific's interest under the judgment lien. To satisfy the judgment, Roberts obtained a writ of execution,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Betenson v. Call Auto & Equipment Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Automotive Manufacturers Warehouse, Inc. v. Service Auto Parts, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ames v. ParrottNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API