Wilson v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
The question to be decided is whether a binding arbitration clause in a group medical and hospital agreement governs a claim for prenatal injuries by a child who, while not a member of the group at the time of medical malpractice, becomes one at the moment of his birth.
Defendants Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Hospitals) and Permanente Medical Group (Permanente) appeal from an order denying enforcement of an arbitration provision in a medical services contract to plaintiff’s cause of action for prenatal injuries. We hold that the arbitration clause is binding upon plaintiff and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Scott v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Victoria v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- County of Contra Costa v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Garrison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.