Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Farmore Pump & Irrigation

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1991No. 18578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The primary issue presented is whether there is substantial and competent evidence to support the finding of the Industrial Commission that the claimant was an independent contractor and not an employee at the time of the injury. We hold that there was substantial and competent evidence to sustain the Commission’s finding. We also hold that there is no right to appeal an interlocutory order of a referee when the order was not approved or confirmed by the Commission.

*970I.

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Rita Peterson (Peterson) and her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Swanson v. Kraft, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sines v. SinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Nixon v. Webber-Riley Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dehlbom v. STATE, INDUS. SPECIAL INDEMN. FUNDIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cantu v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Livingston v. Ireland BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ball v. Daw Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wheaton v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API