Legal Opinion
City of Merced v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1984No. Civ. 7590PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMLIN, J.
The Case
By its petition for writ of mandamus and its complaint for declaratory judgment plaintiff sought to compel payment of its claim against the State of California (the State) for costs of business goodwill it incurred in an eminent domain proceeding as a result of the enactment of chapter 1275, Statutes of 1975. Specifically, plaintiff asked the court to order the State Controller to pay plaintiff $71,350, plus interest, from a “State budget line item he deems appropriate” or, alternatively, to direct the State Controller to pay the amount from a line item the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Barton v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Tyler v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Marin Hospital District v. RothmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Contra Costa v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Burnsed v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.