Legal Opinion

Sansom v. Sprinkle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1990No. 2-90-198-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOE SPURLOCK, II, Justice.

Jimmy Sansom, relator, brings this original mandamus action complaining that the trial court should not have sustained a contest of his affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal. We agree, and conditionally grant the writ.

This action arises from Sansom’s appeal of his take-nothing judgment in a worker’s compensation action. To perfect that appeal, Sansom filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal. The official court reporter filed a contest claiming that San-som was in fact able to pay costs of appeal. A hearing was held. The respondent trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth Lloyd's Insurance Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Goffney v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Salazar v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Keller v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Honorable Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re Sosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Villegas v. Pate, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Adrian Booker and Nicole Smith v. Anissa Mahmoudi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API