Legal Opinion

Villegas v. Pate

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 11, 1996No. 13-95-468-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

In this original mandamus proceeding, Maria Villegas, individually and as representative and beneficiary of the estate of Jose M. Villegas, complains that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining a contest to her affidavit of inability to pay costs of appeal of the underlying case. We conditionally grant a writ of mandamus.

Villegas originally brought the underlying lawsuit against Griffin Industries, Inc., Larry Findley, R.T. McNorton, F. Garza, D. Gonzales, and H. Villarreal, for numerous causes of action arising out of allegedly false accusations and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Allred v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jeanette B. FLOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TURBINE SUPPORT DIVISION Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Pinchback v. HocklesTexas Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Honorable Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ortega v. Trevino, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Grimaldo v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Fred Pope v. Shelby Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010
  5. Fred Pope v. Shelby Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API