Modern Holdings, LLC v. Corning Incorporated
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON MODERN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No: 5:19-cv-00182-GFVT ) V. ) ) CORNING INCORPORATED, et al., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) & Defendant, ) ORDER ) ) ) *** *** *** *** Before the Court are three, inextricably linked motions: Defendant City of Danville’s Motion to Dismiss [R. 13], Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [R. 20], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [R. 24.] With the City of Danville as a defendant, Plaintiffs argue that remand is required because the parties are not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.