Legal Opinion
Holt v. George Washington Life Insurance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 1956No. 1789PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
Holt was the holder of a Hospital and Surgicál Expense Policy and a Medical Care Policy, issued by the insurance company on February 8, 1954; he was treated by a physician for a duodenal ulcer in September 1954, while admittedly the policies were in force and certain policy benefits were paid to him by the company for that illness. In July 1955 he was operated on 'and the ulcer was removed.
The premiums on these policies were paid monthly; there is no dispute that they were duly paid to and including the month of March 1955; there is controversy as to whether the April 1955…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Campbell v. WillisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cameron v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- American Insurance Company v. TuttDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.