Legal Opinion
American Insurance Company v. Tutt
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1974No. 7158PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:
In this appeal the appellant (hereinafter the “company”) seeks relief from a decision by the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment in its action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not obligated to pay appellee anything under the terms of the uninsured motorist coverage in his automobile insurance policy. The trial court granted summary judgment to appellee (hereinafter the “insured”), holding, in effect, that he was entitled to recover. We affirm.
On or about December 12, 1968, the insured paid a premium to the company on a comprehensive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. MesnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Stinson v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Holt v. George Washington Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Poulos v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Vaughan v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- McKoy v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Sproles v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.