Legal Opinion

Musko v. Musko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1997No. 37 W.D.1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

548 Pa. 378 (1997)

697 A.2d 255

Richard P. MUSKO, Appellant,

v.

Naomi B. MUSKO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted August 7, 1996.

Decided June 18, 1997.

Leo M. Stepanian, Butler, for Richard P. Musko.

Norman D. Jaffe, Butler, for Naomi B. Musko.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.[1]

The sole question before the court is whether a valid antenuptial agreement which states that a spouse "shall not be entitled to receive any money or property or alimony or support" in the event of divorce or separation…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Western Oil Fields, Inc. v. Pennzoil United, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Minnotte AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API