Legal Opinion

Crum v. Boyd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Wayne Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

Action by Boyd against Crum and others, on a promissory note.

The defendants answered that at the time the note was given, they were agents for a railroad company; that the plaintiff executed to said company a deed, conveying to the corporation the right of way for the road, through the plaintiff’s land; that the making of said conveyance was the only consideration for the note; that the plaintiff well knew at the time, that the defendants had no interest in the transaction except as. agents of the company; and that it was understood that they were not to be personally liable on the note.

To…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prather v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Shordan v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Aurora National Bank v. DilsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Loeb v. FlanneryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API