Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Flannery

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The sole question presented by the record, as stated by the attorneys for the respective parties, is whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit the evidence offered by appellant under his plea of want of consideration for the promise contained in the instrument in suit, and in directing a verdict in favor of appellee.

If the proffered evidence was properly excluded by the trial court there was no other course left open to the court than to direct a verdict in favor of appellee, for no defense to the case made by appellee was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Hypes v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Henry v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Schultz v. Plankinton BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Egleston v. KnickerbackerNew York Supreme Court · 1849

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee Wah Koon v. Maui Dry Goods & Grocery Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1928
  2. P. & O. Banking Corp. v. Wurm Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. People ex rel. Barrett v. Rio State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API