Legal Opinion

Aurora National Bank v. Dils

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1897No. 2,205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

The appellant was sued by the appellee, who recovered judgment upon a special verdict, in which the facts were shown, in substance, as follows: The appellant, a bank of deposit, located at Aurora, Dearborn county, Indiana, had been in existence for more than five years at the time of the trial in March, 1896, and Alexander B. Pattison had been its cashier from its organization. From the month of July, 1894, to the 8th of August, 1895, the appellee made deposits of money in said bank, and on the morning of the 8th of August, 1895, had on deposit there of his individual funds,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Second Nat'l Bank v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McEwen v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Prather v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Hayes v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Eads v. Commercial National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Utah-Idaho Live Stock Loan Co. v. Blackfoot City BankDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1921
  5. State of Md. Comptroller v. Badlia Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API