Legal Opinion
Geddes v. County of Kane
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 7, 2000No. 98 C 7722PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, landowners in Kane County, sued defendant Philip Bus, Director of the Kane County Development Department, due to his actions in connection with their rezoning request. Mr. Bus moves to dismiss all of the plaintiffs’ claims against him. For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Choh-Ying (Amy) and Larry G. Geddes, who are married, own approximately 16.5 acres of land in Kane County, Illinois. On November 29, 1996, the Ged-deses sought to have their land rezoned from “F”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises, Incorporated, and Nazco Enterprises, Incorporated v. Samuel T. MacRane Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kristian v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Martha Kristian and James D. Masterman v. Comcast Corporation Comcast Mo Group, Inc. Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. And Comcast Holdings Corporation, at & T Broadband, Jack Rogers and Paul Pinella v. Comcast Corporation and at & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006