State v. Dunkerson

I. INTRODUCTION

¶1 Carl Dunkerson (Dunkerson) appeals from the amended judgment entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, ordering him to pay restitution. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court err in ordering Dunkerson to pay restitution when the Presentence Investigation report did not contain victim pecuniary loss documentation?

¶4 Did the District Court err in basing pecuniary loss findings on the victim’s listing of valuations not founded on…