United States v. Franklin Torres
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Senior Circuit Judge Williams.
1Opinion of the Court
Pillard, Circuit Judge:
J.A., a teenage boy, testified at trial that Defendant-Appellant Franklin Torres, an adult twice his age, had anal sex with him, and that during the same encounter Torres used his cell phone to take four photographs of J.A.'s erect penis while J.A. was lying on his back alone on his parents' bed, naked, with his hands covering his face. Torres posted one of the photos to Facebook, and all four were later discovered on Torres's phone. The jury convicted Torres under District of Columbia law of sexually abusing a minor, and under federal law of producing, possessing, and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. DostDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
- United States v. Edwin E. WiegandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. BroxmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Charles HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Logan McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Scott FortierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Shan ShiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.