Hayes v. Port of Seattle
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF-THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
Appellant filed his bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the enforcement of an act of the legislature of the State of Washington, approved March 11, 1913 (Sess. Laws, p. 195), entitled “An act vacating a portion of Smith’s Cove Waterway, in the city of Seattle, and vesting the title of the vacated portion in the port of Seattle,” upon the ground (a) that it impaired the obligation of an existing contract between him and the State, in violation of § 10 of Art. I of the Constitution of the United States; and (b) that it deprived him of property without due process of law, contrary to §…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hurley v. KincaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Charles v. BaeslerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.