Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Ostrom, Rec.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1933No. 25,597PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The appellees, Britton and Stuvel, doing business under the name and style of Britton and Stuvel, brought this action to recover a judgment against the appellants, Flanders and Flanders, for work and material furnished under a written contract for the installation of the plumbing and heating in a dwelling house being erected by appellants and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Later an amended complaint was filed setting out substantially the same facts as alleged in the original complaint, and in addition other facts upon which to base a request for the appointment of a receiver. The court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pilliod v. Angola Railway & Power Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Blythe v. GibbonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gray v. OughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Herman v. HawleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clouser v. MockIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ratcliff v. Citizens Bank of Western IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Vanjani v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Guydon v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API