Legal Opinion

Gray v. Oughton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1896No. 17,948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Pulaski Circuit Court, appointing a receiver “to take charge of the rents and profits of (certain) described real estate,” situate in Pulaski county.

A large body of land is shown by the complaint to have formerly belonged to appellant, Thomas Gray; that he and his co-appellant, Jennie A. Gray, his wife, had conveyed said lands to one Judd, and that Judd had conveyed them to appellee; that afterwards Jennie A. Gray was duly appointed guardian of said Thomas for unsoundness of mind; that afterwards, in a suit between appellee and said Grays…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Lime City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bufkin v. BoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. KenneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Flanders v. Ostrom, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sallee v. SoulesIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Indianapolis Dairymen's Co-Op., Inc. v. BottemaIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Levin v. Florsheim & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API