Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Kerst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (White, J.), entered July 14, 1992 in Hamilton County, which granted petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of respondent Town of Indian Lake Zoning Board of Appeals granting certain respondents an area variance.
After an area variance had been granted to respondents John Starling and Wendy Starling by respondent Town of Indian Lake Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter the Board) on October 13, 1989, permitting construction of a boathouse on their property on Blue Mountain Lake in Hamilton…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Doyle v. AmsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Stengel v. Town of Woodstock Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sheer Pleasure Lingerie, Inc. v. Town of Colonie Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Razzano v. Planning Board of the Town of North ElbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996