Legal Opinion

Stout v. Cargill, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1960No. 38832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justifre.

In this action defendant in error,, Car-gill, Inc., a corporation, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”, seeks to recover from plaintiffs in error, C. ,D. Stout and Arthur Stout, co-partners, hereafter referred to as “defendants”., the sum of $902133, together with interest, as the value of 36,830-pounds of mai-ze which -defendants undertook to. transport by truck from a point in Texas to a point in California.

Plaintiff buys grain throughout the United States. Defendants transport grain and other commodities by truck. In August, 1957, plaintiff purchased milo from an elevator…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Holdenville v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Frank Harber Buick, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. DarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co. v. WentsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API