Legal Opinion

Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. Woods

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1963No. 39849-39852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Charlie Woods, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced four separate actions, one against each of the plaintiffs in error, Great Southern Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Pacific National Fire Insurance Company, Manhattan Fire & Marine Compáriy, and The Home Insurance Company, to recover under separate insurance policies issued by each company. A motion for consolidation of the actions was filed in each case based on the fact that the alleged losses all occurred from the same fire. It was stipulated and agreed that the cases be consolidated for trial; that one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Ruther v. TyraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Midland Valley Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Cabiniss v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Kelly v. CannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. COVEL v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Governor House v. SchmidtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BirksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Missouri National Life Insurance Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. First Southwest Life Insurance Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API