Kelley v. Kingsbury
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Alleging that he has fully complied with all the preliminary requirements of the “Mineral Leasing Act” (Stats. 1921, p. 404), petitioner has applied for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to issue a permit to him to prospect for oil and gas upon certain designated tide lands located within the Elwood oil-field. Upon issuance of the alternative writ the respondent interposed a general demurrer and filed a return to the writ.
In the return the respondent alleges that on September 7, 1928, which was long before petitioner made an application for permission to lease, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Meyer v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Morales v. IngelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Perry v. ChattersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.