Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Kingsbury

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 12146PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Alleging that he has fully complied with all the preliminary requirements of the “Mineral Leasing Act” (Stats. 1921, p. 404), petitioner has applied for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to issue a permit to him to prospect for oil and gas upon certain designated tide lands located within the Elwood oil-field. Upon issuance of the alternative writ the respondent interposed a general demurrer and filed a return to the writ.

In the return the respondent alleges that on September 7, 1928, which was long before petitioner made an application for permission to lease, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Meyer v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Morales v. IngelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Perry v. ChattersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API