Denver & Salt Lake Railroad v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the Public Utilities Commission.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hill
This action is to review an order of our Public Utilities Commission fixing a division or apportionment of through rates on coal to be shipped from points in northwestern Colorado, known as the Oak Hills district, on the road of the petitioner to points in the eastern part of the state on the roads of the respondents. (2 Colo. P. U. C. Rep. 8.) For convenience, the petitioner, The Denver & Salt Lake Railroad Company will be called “the Moffat road”; the respondent, The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company “the Burlington”; The Union Pacific Railroad Company, “the Union Pacific;” the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Application of Diamond State Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Colorado Municipal League v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Denver & Salt Lake Railroad v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Colorado Power Co. v. HaldermanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1924
- Colorado Utilities Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.