State v. Santiago
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on two counts of failure to assist a peace officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167b (a). He claims (1) that he was deprived of a fair trial when the trial court allowed the state to amend its information on the morning of trial by adding two new counts, (2) that General Statutes § 53a-167b is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and (3) that the trial court should have instructed the jury that they should acquit the defendant of failure to assist a peace officer if it found that the officers’ request was unlawful. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. SchriverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. HuffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. ColeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990