Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 21, 1990No. 8555PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on two counts of failure to assist a peace officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167b (a). He claims (1) that he was deprived of a fair trial when the trial court allowed the state to amend its information on the morning of trial by adding two new counts, (2) that General Statutes § 53a-167b is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and (3) that the trial court should have instructed the jury that they should acquit the defendant of failure to assist a peace officer if it found that the officers’ request was unlawful. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. SchriverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. HuffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. State v. ColeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API