Legal Opinion
Service Investment Co. v. Dorst
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Sec. 75.62 (1), Stats., reads as follows:
“75.62 Tax sales; actions to set aside. (1) Conditional ■payment. Whenever any action or special proceeding is hereafter commenced to set aside any sale of lands for the nonpayment of taxes, or to cancel any tax certificate, or to’ restrain the issuing of any tax certificate or tax deed, or t0‘ set aside any tax, for any error or defect going to the validity of the assessment and affecting the groundwork of such tax, within twenty days after the commencement of such action the plaintiff in such action, or special proceeding shall pay or cause to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Greenough v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Wisconsin Real Estate Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Trustees of Clinton Lodge No. 152 v. Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Kales v. City of Oak ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Mahon v. Security First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- S. A. M. v. Nancy M. MeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.