Trustees of Clinton Lodge No. 152 v. Rock County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The defendants contend that the plaintiff cannot maintain this action because it does not appear that within twenty days after its commencement the plaintiff paid, or caused to be paid, to the taxing officers the amount of taxes, interest, and charges as a condition of maintaining the action.
The plaintiff seeks to maintain the action upon the sole ground that the property in question was exempt from taxa*170tion. It has been held that under such circumstances the taxing officers were without jurisdiction, and compliance with the section was not required. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Arnold (1902),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wisconsin Real Estate Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Methodist Episcopal Church Baraca Club v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Trustees of Green Bay Lodge, No. 259 v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Cardinal Publishing Co. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hermann v. Town of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Hahn v. Walworth CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Friendship Village of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. City of La CrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.