Legal Opinion

Kinder v. Notorangelo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1980No. 42309PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals from that portion of a trial court judgment granting defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s petition for damages for personal injuries. The trial court’s grant of respondent’s motion for summary judgment was based on the fact that appellant had obtained respondent’s general release from any liability arising out of the automobile accident which was the subject of appellant’s petition.

Appellant charges the trial court erred in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Plaza Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hurwitz v. KohmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. 66 Terminal, Inc. v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Bailey v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bishop v. United Missouri Bank of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Gal v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Biermann v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Blankenship v. Better Business BureauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Kessinger Hunter Management Co. v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API