Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Better Business Bureau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1989No. 56363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Chief Judge.

Appellants, Kenneth Blankenship and Mary Blankenship, appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of respondent, Better Business Bureau. Appellants contend that: (1) the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to respondent because respondent did not show by unassailable proof that it had provided appellants with all relevant information concerning the general contractor appellants had hired to enlarge their residence; and (2) the affidavit of Michelle Corey filed in support of respondent’s motion for summary judgment failed to comply with Rule 74.04. We reverse and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madden v. C & K Barbecue Carryout, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Clark v. OlsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Hoffman v. KoehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hayes v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. AAA Excavating, Inc. v. Francis Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. EnochMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Stroup v. Facet Automotive Filter Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Interstate Distributing, Inc. v. FreemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Baker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API